« Welcome!
New rogues from well known domain »

Malware armoring is now the norm. :’(

April 14th, 2008

Traditionally, we have seen advanced behavior in malware trickle down from the top tier threats to the more common samples. One such disturbing trend is armoring. This is when malware actively defends itself against removal and analysis. This can be achieved in many different ways and we often use the less subtle of these traits as a quick method of confirming infection.  It is obvious that a system is infected with malware, if the user suddenly finds he cannot run common tools, such as the registry editor, or the task manager.

We now routinely encounter samples that go one step further, preventing common code analysis tools such as ollydbg, or IDApro from running, or executing a different payload altogether. This is an effort on the part of the bad guys to delay analysis for as long as possible.  It also forces the development of expensive in-house tools to take malware apart.

Most security analyst use virtualization in one form or another as part of their day to day operations. Launching samples inside of a guest virtual machine, running on a host computer is much faster than actually infecting a real computer. You don’t have to re-image your machine once the malware has been scrutinized, simply reset the image. This makes virtual machines an ideally suited testing environment. The malware authors have become aware of this, and are now implementing methods in which malcode will actually verify if it in a virtual environment before executing.

 As this trend gradually becomes the norm, we are seeing 3rd party software, that offer anti-virtualization armoring techniques for the less skilled attackers.  

 

What was once reserved for advanced threats has now become the norm. It is disheartening to see how rapidly this occured. These new capabilities do have the strange side effect of making the use of virtualization safer, from an end user’s perspective, as most of the malware will assume it is in this environment for dissection purposes, and thus refuse to execute.

Jean Taggart

    This entry was posted on Monday, April 14th, 2008 at 9:13 am and is filed under Malware Trends. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Comments:

    • (0) comments
    • |
    • Add your comments




Pages

  • About
  • Contact Us



Archives

  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008



Categories

  • Botnets (2)
  • Exploits (8)
  • Fake codecs (3)
  • IM threats (1)
  • Keyloggers (1)
  • Malware Trends (16)
  • Phishing (3)
  • Research (2)
  • Rogue software (18)
  • Rootkits (1)
  • Uncategorized (12)
  • Wireless Security (1)



 
 
 

© 2008 ParetoLogic Inc.